<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreknowledge and Free Will II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.holycyclops.com/2008/06/02/foreknowledge-and-free-will-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.holycyclops.com/2008/06/02/foreknowledge-and-free-will-ii/</link>
	<description>Devoted to Truth</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: collagen</title>
		<link>http://blog.holycyclops.com/2008/06/02/foreknowledge-and-free-will-ii/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>collagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.holycyclops.com/?p=32#comment-893</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;collagen...&lt;/strong&gt;

azienda farmaceutica arimidex. arimidex for men. arimidex for men. pictures of arimidex. pictures of arimidex. arimidex more drug side effects. arimidex side effects. antabuse side effects. antabuse no prescription. antabuse drug. antidote for antabuse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>collagen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>azienda farmaceutica arimidex. arimidex for men. arimidex for men. pictures of arimidex. pictures of arimidex. arimidex more drug side effects. arimidex side effects. antabuse side effects. antabuse no prescription. antabuse drug. antidote for antabuse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holy Cyclops &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foreknowledge and Free Will III</title>
		<link>http://blog.holycyclops.com/2008/06/02/foreknowledge-and-free-will-ii/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy Cyclops &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foreknowledge and Free Will III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.holycyclops.com/?p=32#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] background for this post appears here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] background for this post appears here and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://blog.holycyclops.com/2008/06/02/foreknowledge-and-free-will-ii/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.holycyclops.com/?p=32#comment-39</guid>
		<description>The problem with this argument is that 

(2) N(Kx)

is false. You’d be hard pressed in finding a theist who holds that God’s foreknowledge is necessary. That God’s foreknowledge is not necessary can be seen by the simple fact that it varies from world to world. In fact, in worlds where God refrains from creating time, for example, he will lack foreknowledge altogether. Or again consider creaturely freedom. From the mere fact that God knows S will do x, nothing necessarily entails S will do x. It just follows that S won’t refrain from doing x, though S possibly could have. Were S to refrain from x and performed y instead, God’s foreknowledge would have been different. 

As for a reply to your reply to my reply to your first argument, Nx is very much needed. For most definitions of what it means for an agent to be free is to lack necessary antecedent conditions determining their actions. N is just such a condition. If you are to negate such a definition of freedom, you need an antecedent condition such as N to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this argument is that </p>
<p>(2) N(Kx)</p>
<p>is false. You’d be hard pressed in finding a theist who holds that God’s foreknowledge is necessary. That God’s foreknowledge is not necessary can be seen by the simple fact that it varies from world to world. In fact, in worlds where God refrains from creating time, for example, he will lack foreknowledge altogether. Or again consider creaturely freedom. From the mere fact that God knows S will do x, nothing necessarily entails S will do x. It just follows that S won’t refrain from doing x, though S possibly could have. Were S to refrain from x and performed y instead, God’s foreknowledge would have been different. </p>
<p>As for a reply to your reply to my reply to your first argument, Nx is very much needed. For most definitions of what it means for an agent to be free is to lack necessary antecedent conditions determining their actions. N is just such a condition. If you are to negate such a definition of freedom, you need an antecedent condition such as N to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
